ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Systems

ISO/IEC 27001 defines requirements for an information security management system: risk assessment, Annex A controls, internal audit, and management review. Certification comes through an accredited body via a two-stage audit, with annual surveillance on a three-year cycle. The 2022 revision replaced the 2013 edition, with transition required by October 2025.

Updated 2026-11-01 · 173 tracked updates

ISO 27001 is the international standard for information security management systems (ISMS). It provides a systematic approach to managing sensitive information through risk assessment, security controls, and continuous improvement.

173
Regulations Tracked
12
Jurisdictions
10
Upcoming Milestones
2026-11-01
Last Updated

Who Needs to Comply?

Any organization of any size, in any sector, that wants to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an information security management system. Widely adopted across technology, finance, healthcare, and government.

Key Dates & Timeline

Latest version ISO/IEC 27001:2022 published October 2022. Transition from 2013 version required by October 2025. Annex A controls aligned with ISO 27002:2022.

Upcoming Milestones

2026-12-02

Article 5 prohibitions on realistic intimate synthetic content and CSAM-related AI practices apply

Digital Omnibus on AI amends the EU AI Act
2026-12-02

Providers of AI systems generating synthetic audio, image, video or text must comply with Article 50(2) marking steps if placed on market before 2 Aug 2026

Digital Omnibus on AI amends the EU AI Act
2026-12-31
2026-12-31

BAIT continues for some firms during transition period before DORA replacement

BaFin DORA implementation guidance and filing procedures
2027-01-01

Remaining FinmadiG transition ends for certain German institutions

BaFin DORA implementation guidance and filing procedures

Latest ISO 27001 Updates

guidancelow2026-11-01

Guidance by Topic

The PDPC guidance-by-topic page is a directory that groups Singapore privacy resources by topic and resource type.

guidancehigh2026-11-01

FCA review of the long-term impact of AI on retail financial services

The FCA is reviewing how AI may reshape retail financial services by 2030 and beyond and is seeking views on future technology, market, consumer, and regulatory implications rather than proposing new rules now.

guidancehigh2026-10-25

FDA draft guidance on lifecycle management and marketing submissions for AI-enabled devices

The FDA’s draft guidance recommends documentation and lifecycle-management practices for marketing submissions covering AI-enabled device software functions.

guidancemedium2026-10-25

ISO/IEC 27090 explained guide on AI security threats

ISO's guide explains that ISO/IEC 27090 provides security guidance for AI systems, focusing on AI-specific threats, detection, and mitigation across the AI life cycle.

guidancelow2026-10-18

AEPD innovation and technology resources page updated with AI/privacy materials

The AEPD’s innovation-and-technology portal lists updated resources on AI, risk management, privacy by design, and age assurance, signaling where the agency is directing compliance attention.

guidancehigh2026-10-18

Basic Online Safety Expectations and reporting guidance

The Basic Online Safety Expectations outline the Australian Government’s expectations that certain online service providers take reasonable steps to keep Australians safe, and eSafety can require reporting on how they are meeting them.

enactedhigh2026-10-18

Colorado became the first state to pass cross-sectoral private-sector rules for certain high-risk AI systems

Colorado is identified as the first state to pass cross-sectoral private-sector rules for certain high-risk AI systems, establishing a state-level baseline for AI governance.

bill-introducedlow2026-10-18

U.S. state AI governance legislation tracker resource

The IAPP tracker is a reference resource on U.S. state AI governance legislation for private-sector organizations, not itself a new law or rule.

enforcementmedium2026-10-18

FTC reopens and sets aside Rytr AI testimonial order

The FTC reopened and set aside its 2024 final order against Rytr after concluding the complaint did not satisfy the FTC Act and the order unduly burdened AI innovation.

enforcementhigh2026-10-18

FTC final orders against Cox Media Group and two marketing firms over deceptive AI-powered advertising claims

The FTC finalized orders requiring Cox Media Group and two other firms to pay redress and stop misrepresenting their advertising services, voice-data use, consent, and geographic targeting capabilities.

Jurisdiction Coverage

Related Frameworks

Key Topics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ISO 27001 and how do you get certified?

ISO/IEC 27001 defines requirements for an information security management system: risk assessment, Annex A controls, internal audit, and management review. Certification comes through an accredited body via a two-stage audit, with annual surveillance on a three-year cycle. The 2022 revision replaced the 2013 edition, with transition required by October 2025.

What is ISO 27001?

ISO 27001 is the internationally recognized standard for information security management. It defines requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an ISMS, covering risk assessment, security controls, and continuous improvement processes.

How does ISO 27001 relate to AI compliance?

ISO 27001 provides the foundational information security framework that AI systems should operate within. It addresses data protection, access controls, and risk management — all critical for AI governance. Many organizations pursue ISO 27001 alongside ISO 42001 for comprehensive AI + security coverage.

What is the difference between ISO 27001 and ISO 42001?

ISO 27001 focuses on information security management broadly, while ISO 42001 specifically addresses AI management systems. ISO 42001 builds on ISO 27001's risk-based approach but adds AI-specific requirements for responsible AI development, deployment, and use.

Keep exploring

This hub tracks published actions that reference ISO 27001; it is not certification guidance from an accredited body and cannot substitute for a gap assessment.