AI Regulation in US Federal
US Federal has 159 tracked AI regulatory updates across 5 frameworks. This page provides an overview of the current regulatory landscape, upcoming deadlines, and recent enforcement activity.
Recent Regulatory Updates
Multiple AI-related U.S. court and state actions signal rising litigation risk
The source set includes multiple recent court decisions and state legislative actions around AI, biometric data, and automated decision tools, indicating that U.S. litigation and state-law exposure for AI systems is expanding even without a single federal AI statute.
FTC continues AI deception and AI-companion scrutiny
The FTC’s recent AI enforcement and 6(b) activity shows that deceptive AI claims, misleading chatbot marketing, and data-handling practices remain active enforcement targets and can trigger orders, notices, or information demands without new AI-specific legislation.
SEC actions on false and misleading AI statements
SEC enforcement releases in 2024–2026 show the Commission continuing to treat false or misleading AI claims as a disclosure and fraud problem for public companies and advisers.
FTC inquiry into generative AI investments and partnerships
The FTC’s 6(b)-style inquiry into major AI investments and partnerships signals antitrust and market-structure scrutiny for AI deals and ecosystem concentration.
FTC authorization for compulsory process for AI-related products and services
The FTC approved compulsory-process authority for AI-related products and services, suggesting faster investigative requests and higher scrutiny of AI claims and practices.
FTC action against IntelliVision for deceptive facial recognition claims
FTC alleged that IntelliVision made unsupported claims that its facial recognition software was bias-free, highly accurate, and spoof-resistant, and the proposed order would bar future claims unless backed by competent and reliable testing.
FTC crackdown on deceptive AI claims and schemes
The FTC’s Operation AI Comply shows the agency is actively pursuing deceptive or unfair AI claims, making substantiation and marketing accuracy urgent compliance issues now.
FTC AI enforcement hub
The FTC’s AI hub consolidates current enforcement materials and investigations, signaling that deceptive AI claims, model substantiation, and AI-related process inquiries remain active priority areas.
COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023
The COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023 was enacted as Public Law No. 118-2 on 2023-03-20, making it a completed federal legislative item with no new AI compliance obligation identified in the source.
FDA draft guidance on artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices
The FDA’s January 2025 draft guidance on AI-enabled medical devices remains the key current benchmark for lifecycle, transparency, bias, and documentation expectations for AI device submissions and post-market controls.
FTC settles deceptive “active listening” AI marketing claims with Cox Media Group and two firms
On 2026-05-21, the FTC required Cox Media Group and two other firms to pay $930,000 to resolve allegations that they falsely claimed an AI-powered “active listening” service could target ads using consumers’ smart-device conversations and that consumers had opted in.
FISA Amendments Act extension enacted
Congress enacted a law extending the authorities of Title VII of FISA through 2026-04-30, so organizations reliant on US intelligence-collection authorities should refresh legal and vendor-risk assumptions before the extension lapses.
Bill C-27 / AIDA remains proposed in Canada
Canada’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Act remains proposed legislation within Bill C-27 and has not become law, so teams should treat it as a live monitoring item rather than an immediate compliance deadline.
FDA guidance on AI-enabled medical devices remains active
FDA continues to emphasize lifecycle-wide expectations for AI-enabled medical devices, including transparency and predetermined change control, so developers need submission-ready documentation for model changes and postmarket monitoring.
FTC continues AI deception enforcement
The FTC kept up AI deception actions, including bans, monetary relief, and notice obligations, so any unsupported AI performance, compliance, or capability claim now carries concrete enforcement risk.
Applicable Frameworks
Key Topics
Weekly digest — coming soon
Leave your email to get the first issue when it ships. Free, no account required.
We use your email only for the digest. Privacy policy